Jonagold Apples

Integrated Pest Management for Apples

A Guide for Sampling and Decision-Making for Key Apple Pests in Northwest Washington

 

Delayed Dormant Through Pink (Bud Stages 2-6) Late March through mid-April

 

Acknowledgements

Nooksack IPM Advisory Committee

Introduction

Key Sampling Periods

Part 1 - Pre-bloom

Key Pests
Biology
Monitoring
Scouting Report

Part 2 - Bloom through Petal-Fall

Part 3 - Late Spring and Summer

Part 4 - Post Harvest

Part 5 - Tables and Charts

Part 6 - IPM Resources

Part 7 - Pesticides and Water

 

Monitoring

Weather Station
Orchardists use weather stations(Metos shown here) to record temperature and leaf wetness periods; Critical for predicting scab infection.

 

Apple Scab

Most growers automatically apply a fungicide at the half inch green stage as an initial measure to protect emerging foliage from primary scab infection. After this initial spray, there are two approaches to controlling primary scab using fungicides. They are a Protectant program or an Eradicant program. In the protectant program, sprays are applied every 7-10 days for the entire primary infection period until all of the overwintering ascospores have been discharged (usually about mid to late June when apples are ½ inch in diameter). This approach requires about 10 to 11 sprays, which may be impractical to some growers who have large acreage and only one tractor and sprayer. However, in the maritime climate of western Washington, which is very favorable for scab infection, many growers are shifting to a protectant program to reduce the guesswork and minimize the risk of scab infection.

In the eradicant program, spray scheduling is based upon the determination that environmental conditions within your orchard are favorable for infection (an infection period has occurred). There are several methods to help determine whether an infection period has occurred. Some growers use computerized scab prediction models (Metos system) which are driven by instrumentation in place in the orchard. Instruments record temperature and the time period of leaf wetness. These values are automatically fed into a computer model which is capable of identifying if and when infection has occurred and the relative degree or seriousness of an infection period. This information can then be used to determine fairly precisely, given the characteristics of different fungicides, a deadline for treatment in order to kickback or stop the infection from progressing within the leaf tissue. The kickback or reachback period for various eradicant fungicides is specified on the product label. As an alternative to a computer generated model, growers can use leaf wetness and temperature guages in the orchard, and compare their measurements to the Scab Infection Table shown in the Tables and Charts section page 5-3, to identify scab infection periods. This method is considerably less expensive than a computerized scab prediction model but does require close monitoring of instrumentation and simple mathematical calculations performed in a timely fashion. Whatcom county growers who use an eradicant strategy usually make six or seven fungicide applications from half inch green stage through mid to late June to control primary scab.

The potential threat from this disease in western Washington is not to be underestimated. Some growers who have used an eradicant approach in recent years have experienced poor control. In these situations, fruit and foliar lesions have first been observed in late May to early June, which is towards the end of the primary scab infection period. The specific reasons for these failures are not precisely understood and are possibly due to one or more of these factors:

  • Gala variety is most susceptible.
  • Low rate of fungicide application relative to disease pressure.
  • Exceeding the kickback period beyond the capability of the fungicide.
  • Favorable weather conditions for the disease and higher than ordinary disease inoculum levels.
  • Disease may be resistant to certain eradicant fungicides.
  • Dilution of fungicide active ingredient on the leaf surface due to rain.
  • For these reasons, when using an eradicant approach, consider the factors above and err on the conservative side to minimize the opportunity for error.

 


Beating tray used to monitor pest and benificial insect activity.

 

Lygus bug damage
Deformed fruit caused by Lygus Bug feeding when fruit was small.

Sucking Insects

The beating tray is a useful tool to dislodge and then identify insects which are active on buds and expanding leaves. Prior to early pink stage;

  • Visit 3 to 5 sites within the orchard and along borders.
  • At each site, take at least ten tray samples and record the total number and identity of insects detected (lygus bugs, stink bugs, syneta beetle, minute pirate bugs are most common).
  • Hold the tray just below the branch and strike the branch lightly three times with a short section of rubber sprayer hose.
  • Insects which fall to the tray may fly off quickly. It is therefore necessary to look at the tray and mentally record the results as you go from tree to tree until you have completed ten samples at each site.
  • Alternate samples between the rows, at various heights, and check every other tree until ten branches have been sampled. Record the results.
  • This sampling should be done during the heat of the day when lygus bugs are more active and in the trees.

There are no established decision-making thresholds based on this sampling procedure. Even seemingly low density of lygus or stink bugs may cause excessive damage to fruit. Many growers routinely apply an insecticide prior to bloom (pre-bee spray) due to their experience with early season fruit deformity from sucking insects. Regardless of this, this sampling procedure is a useful way to:

  • Confirm that the target pest is present.
  • Compare pre- and post-treatment counts of pests and beneficials.
  • Detect other arthropods for later identification and pest status.
  • Familiarize yourself with beneficial and pest insects in your orchard.

 

OBLR Larvae
Young Obliquebanded Leafroller larva

 

Leafroller damage
Leafroller larvae feed on expanding leaves and flower clusters.

Obliquebanded leafroller

It can be difficult to detect larvae between green tip and tight cluster stage by visual examination in the field. To accurately estimate leafroller density during this period, buds can be collected from the field and returned to the home or shop for examination under magnification. This sampling procedure, although time consuming, can be used as a management tool to determine if a delayed-dormant control is necessary:

  • Collect at least 150 fruit buds (6 buds from 25 trees) from a block (5 acres).

By the tight cluster stage to pink stage, larvae can be detected without magnification as webbing and feeding damage is more obvious at this time. The following sampling program is adapted from a sequential sampling system discussed in the Cornell Apple IPM program manual. It may be useful for confirming OBLR presence and justification for treatment during the pink and bloom stages.

  • Examine 10 bud clusters or expanding terminals per tree for live OBLR larvae.
  • Choose half of your clusters or terminals from inside the tree and the other half from near the outside of the canopy.
  • Sample from random trees that are representative of the entire block.
  • If you detect 2 or more infested clusters in the first 20 to 30 samples or more than 3 in the first 100 clusters examined, treatment is advised.
  • If you detect no infestation after examining 50 clusters treatment is probably not necessary.

These leafroller sampling methods have not been evaluated here in Whatcom County in apples but similar procedures are used to scout for this insect in raspberries. Due to the direct fruit damage potential from even low populations of leafrollers at this time of the year, many growers apply Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) at the pink and bloom stage to protect fruit. This timing is well suited to control overwintering larvae in the spring. Sampling as described above should be considered, because winter survival of OBLR larvae, and therefore damage potential and need for treatment, can vary significantly from year to year.

 

   

 

 

       
 

G.W. Menzies & C.B. MacConnell, WSU Cooperative Extension Whatcom County
December 1999

Funded in part by: Washington State Department of Ecology through U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Section 319 Funds