European
Crane Fly  |
 |
MANAGEMENT
TECHNIQUES -Past and Current
While cultural and biological techniques have been tried, chemical
controls, when effective, have the most pronounced effect. It has
been observed that properly fertilized lawns can endure huge numbers
of larvae and without visible damage. Indeed Blackshaw and Newbold,
1987, showed that N fertilizer treatment in the U.K. during the third
week of March produced grass yields nearly equal to those where Dursban
was used alone. There have been attempts to identify grass cultivars
that demonstrate some level of host plant resistance (Pesho et al.,
1981). This kind of work has not been fruitful to date.
Various biological methods have been utilized. In Canada during 1968,
a tachinid parasite Siphona geniculata (de Geer) was released and
concurrently an iridescent virus was also tested. Neither has been
particularly successful (Wilkinson, 1969). Nematodes show some efficacy,
but rarely demonstrate more than 50% reduction in larval numbers (Stahnke
and Antonelli, 1995).
There are strains that do show respectable efficacy (Berry, R. pers.
Com.). As these become commercially available they will certainly
be tested. MANAGEMENT WITHOUT DURSBAN - Future
Options
Chemicals have historically been the major management tool for crane
fly control, but with the impending loss of the most effective chemical,
Dursban, we are faced with a formidable challenge in finding a replacement
that is both effective and reasonably environmentally sound. The table
below provides a picture of past failures and successes in the PNW.
It is apparent that successes that are reasonably safe have been limited
(Stahnke et al., 1993 Campbell, 1975, Goss et al., 1986). The ratings
are based on interpretation of data based on larval reduction from
pretreatment spring sampling and data comparing treatments and checks
from post treatment spring sampling.
***Coming Soon*** FUTURE QUESTS FOR A DURSBAN REPLACEMENT
***Coming Soon*** |
  Previous
|
Next   |
 |
|
 |
|
|